On the complexity of working set selection
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3850828 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1314294 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1332320 (Why is no real title available?)
- 10.1162/15324430152748218
- A Note on the Decomposition Methods for Support Vector Regression
- A simple decomposition method for support vector machines
- Algorithmic Learning Theory
- Algorithmic Learning Theory
- Algorithmic Learning Theory
- Approximation algorithms for knapsack problems with cardinality constraints
- Convergence of a generalized SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design
- Fast Approximation Algorithms for the Knapsack and Sum of Subset Problems
- Feasible direction decomposition algorithms for training support vector machines
- Improvements to Platt's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design
- Learning Theory
- Learning Theory
- Polynomial-time decomposition algorithms for support vector machines
- QP algorithms with guaranteed accuracy and run time for support vector machines
- Reducibility among combinatorial problems
- Training \(\nu\)-support vector classifiers: Theory and algorithms
Cited in
(9)- Learning Theory
- Minimizing the error of linear separators on linearly inseparable data
- A simple decomposition method for support vector machines
- On the working set selection in gradient projection-based decomposition techniques for support vector machines
- Algorithmic Learning Theory
- Maximum-gain working set selection for SVMs
- On the complexity of non-unique probe selection
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3980537 (Why is no real title available?)
- Primal and dual predicted decrease approximation methods
This page was built for publication: On the complexity of working set selection
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2381582)