On the relation between claim-augmented argumentation frameworks and collective attacks

DOI10.3233/FAIA200159MaRDI QIDQ4999272zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Wolfgang Dvořák, Anna Rapberger, Stefan Woltran

Publication date 6 July 2021

Full work available at URL https://ebooks.iospress.nl/pdf/doi/10.3233/FAIA200159

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
• Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks
• A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
• Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks

Cited in

(6)

• Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
• Ranking-based semantics from the perspective of claims
• On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks
• A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
• On the expressive power of assumption-based argumentation
• Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view

This page was built for publication: On the relation between claim-augmented argumentation frameworks and collective attacks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4999272)