On the representation of holomorphic functions by integrals

Classes of sets (Borel fields, (sigma)-rings, etc.), measurable sets, Suslin sets, analytic sets (28A05) Entire functions of one complex variable (general theory) (30D20) Integration, integrals of Cauchy type, integral representations of analytic functions in the complex plane (30E20)

Review text

Let \(E\subseteq \mathbb{R}\) be measurable, and denote by \(H (U)\) the class of anlaytic functions that are holomorphic on the open subset \(U\) of \(\mathbb{C}\). Suppose that \(\varphi: E\times U\to \mathbb{C}\) satisfies the two conditions \[ \varphi (.,\lambda)\in L^1(E) (\lambda\in U),\;\varphi (x,.) \in H (U) (x\in E) \tag{*} \] and define \(F(\lambda) =\int_E \varphi(x, \lambda) dx\) for \(\lambda\in U\). The question discussed in the paper is: when is \(F\in H (U)\)? It is shown that the conditions (*) are not sufficient. In the main theorem it is established that \(F\in H(U)\) if (*) are satisfied and also the map \(\lambda \mapsto \int_E |\varphi (x,\lambda) | dx\) is locally bounded on \(U\). This last condition is shown not to be necessary.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(27)

This page was built for publication: On the representation of holomorphic functions by integrals

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4385720)