Optimal-Degree Polynomial Approximations for Exponentials and Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation

From MaRDI portal





Abstract: For any real numbers Bge1 and deltain(0,1) and function f:[0,B]ightarrowmathbbR, let dB;delta(f)inmathbbZ>0 denote the minimum degree of a polynomial p(x) satisfying . In this paper, we provide precise asymptotics for dB;delta(ex) and dB;delta(ex) in terms of both B and delta, improving both the previously known upper bounds and lower bounds. In particular, we show d_{B; delta} (e^{-x}) = Thetaleft( max left{ sqrt{B log(delta^{-1})}, frac{log(delta^{-1}) }{ log(B^{-1} log(delta^{-1}))} ight} ight), ext{ and} d_{B; delta} (e^{x}) = Thetaleft( max left{ B, frac{log(delta^{-1}) }{ log(B^{-1} log(delta^{-1}))} ight} ight). Polynomial approximations for ex and ex have applications to the design of algorithms for many problems, and our degree bounds show both the power and limitations of these algorithms. We focus in particular on the Batch Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation problem for n sample points in Theta(logn) dimensions with error delta=nTheta(1). We show that the running time one can achieve depends on the square of the diameter of the point set, B, with a transition at B=Theta(logn) mirroring the corresponding transition in dB;delta(ex): - When B=o(logn), we give the first algorithm running in time n1+o(1). - When B=kappalogn for a small constant kappa>0, we give an algorithm running in time n1+O(loglogkappa1/logkappa1). The loglogkappa1/logkappa1 term in the exponent comes from analyzing the behavior of the leading constant in our computation of dB;delta(ex). - When B=omega(logn), we show that time n2o(1) is necessary assuming SETH.












This page was built for publication: Optimal-Degree Polynomial Approximations for Exponentials and Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6399024)