Optimal uncertainty quantification

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We propose a rigorous framework for Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in which the UQ objectives and the assumptions/information set are brought to the forefront. This framework, which we call emph{Optimal Uncertainty Quantification} (OUQ), is based on the observation that, given a set of assumptions and information about the problem, there exist optimal bounds on uncertainties: these are obtained as values of well-defined optimization problems corresponding to extremizing probabilities of failure, or of deviations, subject to the constraints imposed by the scenarios compatible with the assumptions and information. In particular, this framework does not implicitly impose inappropriate assumptions, nor does it repudiate relevant information. Although OUQ optimization problems are extremely large, we show that under general conditions they have finite-dimensional reductions. As an application, we develop emph{Optimal Concentration Inequalities} (OCI) of Hoeffding and McDiarmid type. Surprisingly, these results show that uncertainties in input parameters, which propagate to output uncertainties in the classical sensitivity analysis paradigm, may fail to do so if the transfer functions (or probability distributions) are imperfectly known. We show how, for hierarchical structures, this phenomenon may lead to the non-propagation of uncertainties or information across scales. In addition, a general algorithmic framework is developed for OUQ and is tested on the Caltech surrogate model for hypervelocity impact and on the seismic safety assessment of truss structures, suggesting the feasibility of the framework for important complex systems. The introduction of this paper provides both an overview of the paper and a self-contained mini-tutorial about basic concepts and issues of UQ.


The authors discuss so called certification problems \(\mathbb{P}[G(X) \geq a] \leq \epsilon\), which means the problem of showing that with probabilty at least \(1-\epsilon\) a response function \(G\) of a given system will not exceed a given safety threshold \(a\). Since \(\mathbb{P}\) and \(G\) often not known a priori, they introduce the set \(\mathcal{A}\) of all admissible scenarios \((f,\mu)\) for the unknown reality \((G,\mathbb{P})\) and investigate the inequality \(\inf_{(f,\mu)\in\mathcal{A}} \mu[f(X) \geq a] \leq \mathbb{P}[G(X) \geq a] \leq \sup_{(f,\mu)\in\mathcal{A}} \mu[f(X) \geq a]\). Within this framework, the authors discuss the problem of uncertainty quantification methodologically and mathematically. Under certain assumptions, they prove reduction theorems which allow reduction to finite dimensional optimization problems. Further, using McDiarmid's inequality and Hoeffding's inequality, they present socalled optimal concentration inequalities. In some cases, they find nonpropagation of uncertainties. The results are applied in detail to practical examples e.g. to Small Particle Hypervelocity Impact Range facilities, to the Seismic Safety Assessment of Structures and to Transport in Porous Media.




Cited in
(53)








This page was built for publication: Optimal uncertainty quantification

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2840354)