Panel unit root tests by combining dependent P values: a comparative study
Summary: We conduct a systematic comparison of the performance of four commonly used \(P\) value combination methods applied to panel unit root tests: the original Fisher test, the modified inverse normal method, Simes test, and the modified truncated product method (TPM). Our simulation results show that under cross-section dependence the original Fisher test is severely oversized, but the other three tests exhibit good size properties. Simes test is powerful when the total evidence against the joint null hypothesis is concentrated in one or very few of the tests being combined, but the modified inverse normal method and the modified TPM have good performance when evidence against the joint null is spread among more than a small fraction of the panel units. These differences are further illustrated through one empirical example on testing purchasing power parity using a panel of OECD quarterly real exchange rates.
- A Note on Combining Dependent Tests of Significance
- A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration.
- A systematic comparison of methods for combining p-values from independent tests
- An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
- Bootstrap unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency
- Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4090552 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3074510 (Why is no real title available?)
- Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors
- Unit Root Tests in ARMA Models with Data-Dependent Methods for the Selection of the Truncation Lag
This page was built for publication: Panel unit root tests by combining dependent \(P\) values: a comparative study
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q642446)