Paraconsistent orbits of logics

From MaRDI portal





The paper examines \textit{paraconsistentization by consistent sets} of logics viewed as consequence relations. In this sense, given a logic \( L=(X,\vdash _{L})\), the paraconsistentization of \(L\) by consistent sets is, \textit{grosso modo}, the result of restricting \(\vdash _{L}\) to pairs \( \left\langle \Gamma ,A\right\rangle \) where \(\Gamma \) is an \(L\)-consistent set (cf. \S 4). In the first ten pages of the paper, the authors review some results by them on the topic. A notable conclusion is that \textit{paradeduction} and \textit{paraconsequence} ``are syntactical and semantical notions mirroring paraconsistentization at the proof-theoretical and semantical dimensions (p. 286). In the rest of the paper, the authors consider the notions of \textit{ paraconsistentization by multideduction} and \textit{paraconsistent orbits of a given logic}. The former one consists, roughly, in ``splitting the consequence relation of a particular logic in different consequence relations, producing as a result different systems, each one of which has its proper consequence relation. On the other hand, the \textit{paraconsistent orbit of a logic }\(L\) can generally be described as the logic obtained by a particular method for paraconsistentizating it, whence the set of all paraconsistent orbits \(L\) equals the set of logics obtained by all methods of paraconsistentization applicable to \(L\).











This page was built for publication: Paraconsistent orbits of logics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2239383)