Partial aliased effect number pattern and selection of optimal compromise designs
This paper is a contribution to the very popular field of fractional factorial design. If the focus is on good estimation of a predescribed number of main effects and two-factor interactions, the design is called compromise design. The authors introduce the so-called partial aliased effect number pattern (P-AENP) and use it for comparison of designs. So they study two-level compromise designs and find theoretical results on so-called clear compromise designs (CCD), strongly clear compromise designs (SCCD) and general optimal compromise designs (GOCD). A number of CCD's, SCCD's and GOCD's with 8, 16, 32 and 64 runs are tabulated.
- Compromise designs under baseline parameterization
- A note on constructing clear compromise plans
- Compromise plans with clear two-factor interactions
- Some theoretical results and constructions of compromise designs with specified sets of clear effects
- Some porperties of aliased component-number pattern for regular fractional factorial designs
- \(2^{n-m}\) designs with resolution III or IV containing clear two-factor interactions
- A general minimum lower-order confounding criterion for two-level regular designs
- A theory on constructing \(2^{n-m}\) designs with general minimum lower order confounding
- Capacity considerations for two-level fractional factorial designs
- Compromise 4ᵐ²^n plans with clear two-factor interactions
- Compromise plans with clear two-factor interactions
- General minimum lower order confounding designs: an overview and a construction theory
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5503199 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1464593 (Why is no real title available?)
- Minimum Aberration 2 k-p Designs
This page was built for publication: Partial aliased effect number pattern and selection of optimal compromise designs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2312011)
