Permutation methods for factor analysis and PCA

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: Researchers often have datasets measuring features xij of samples, such as test scores of students. In factor analysis and PCA, these features are thought to be influenced by unobserved factors, such as skills. Can we determine how many components affect the data? This is an important problem, because it has a large impact on all downstream data analysis. Consequently, many approaches have been developed to address it. Parallel Analysis is a popular permutation method. It works by randomly scrambling each feature of the data. It selects components if their singular values are larger than those of the permuted data. Despite widespread use in leading textbooks and scientific publications, as well as empirical evidence for its accuracy, it currently has no theoretical justification. In this paper, we show that the parallel analysis permutation method consistently selects the large components in certain high-dimensional factor models. However, it does not select the smaller components. The intuition is that permutations keep the noise invariant, while "destroying" the low-rank signal. This provides justification for permutation methods in PCA and factor models under some conditions. Our work uncovers drawbacks of permutation methods, and paves the way to improvements.


From the author's abstract: ``Researchers often have datasets measuring features \(x_{ij}\) of samples, such as test scores of students. In factor analysis and PCA, these features are thought to be influenced by unobserved factors, such as skills. Can we determine how many components affect the data? This is an important problem, because decisions made here have a large impact on all downstream data analysis. Consequently, many approaches have been developed. Parallel Analysis is a popular permutation method: it randomly scrambles each feature of the data. It selects components if their singular values are larger than those of the permuted data. Despite widespread use, as well as empirical evidence for its accuracy, it currently has no theoretical justification. In this paper, the problem is analyzed under the signal plus noise model. Sufficient conditions on the signal components and on the noise component are established to ensure the consistency of the parallel analysis. A simulation study supports the theoretical results and points out interesting features of the parallel analysis. In particular, the effect of signal strength, the effect of delocalization, and the effect of dimension are studied. Finally, it is shown that strong signals may lead to errors in the detection of weak signal components.



Cites work



Describes a project that uses

Uses Software






This page was built for publication: Permutation methods for factor analysis and PCA

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2215761)