Preserving dependent choice
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We prove some general theorems for preserving Dependent Choice when taking symmetric extensions, some of which are unwritten folklore results. We apply these to various constructions to obtain various simple consistency proofs.
Recommendations
Cites work
- DEPENDENT CHOICE, PROPERNESS, AND GENERIC ABSOLUTENESS
- Embedding orders into the cardinals with \(\mathsf {DC}_{\kappa} \)
- Hamel bases and well–ordering the continuum
- Injectivity, Projectivity, and the Axiom of Choice
- Iterating symmetric extensions
- On some questions concerning strong compactness
- On the Effectivity of Some Field Constructions
- Sacks forcing and the total failure of Martin's axiom
- Six impossible rings
- Spectra of uniformity.
- The axiom of choice
- The Bristol model: an abyss called a Cohen real
Cited in
(14)- Choiceless chain conditions
- Combinatorial properties and dependent choice in symmetric extensions based on Lévy collapse
- Iterating symmetric extensions
- DEPENDENT CHOICE, PROPERNESS, AND GENERIC ABSOLUTENESS
- TAKING REINHARDT’S POWER AWAY
- The Morris model
- REALIZING REALIZABILITY RESULTS WITH CLASSICAL CONSTRUCTIONS
- Embedding orders into the cardinals with \(\mathsf {DC}_{\kappa} \)
- Sequential and distributive forcings without choice
- Remarks on Gitik's model and symmetric extensions on products of the Lévy collapse
- Geometric condition for dependent choice
- Forcing more \(\mathsf{DC}\) over the Chang model using the thorn sequence
- Which pairs of cardinals can be Hartogs and Lindenbaum numbers of a set?
- Maximal sets without choice
This page was built for publication: Preserving dependent choice
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5382834)