Sequential and distributive forcings without choice
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In the Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice a forcing notion is "-distributive" if and only if it is "-sequential". We show that without the Axiom of Choice this equivalence fails, even if we include a weak form of the Axiom of Choice, the Principle of Dependent Choice for . Still, the equivalence may still hold along with very strong failures of the Axiom of Choice, assuming the consistency of large cardinal axioms. We also prove that while a -distributive forcing notion may violate Dependent Choice, it must preserve the Axiom of Choice for families of size . On the other hand, a -sequential can violate the Axiom of Choice for countable families. We also provide a condition of "quasiproperness" which is sufficient for the preservation of Dependent Choice, and is also necessary if the forcing notion is sequential.
Cites work
- 0# and some forcing principles
- All uncountable cardinals can be singular
- Choiceless Löwenheim-Skolem property and uniform definability of grounds
- Combinatorial properties and dependent choice in symmetric extensions based on Lévy collapse
- DEPENDENT CHOICE, PROPERNESS, AND GENERIC ABSOLUTENESS
- How to have more things by forgetting how to count them
- On generic extensions without the axiom of choice
- Preserving dependent choice
- Set Theory
- The axiom of choice
- The Bristol model: an abyss called a Cohen real
This page was built for publication: Sequential and distributive forcings without choice
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6052795)