Infinite topology of curve complexes and non-Poincaré duality of Teichmüller modular groups

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1002487



Abstract: In this note, we fill in a gap in the literature by proving that the Teichmueller modular groups (mapping class groups) are not Poincare duality groups and the complexes of curves of surfaces have infinite homotopy type (i.e. are not homotopy equivalent to a finite CW-complex).


In this paper, \(Mod_g\) denotes the mapping class group of a closed orientable surface \(S\) of genus \(g\geq 2\), and \(\mathcal{C}\) denotes the curve complex of \(S\). The following is a result by \textit{J. Harer} [Invent. Math. 84, 157--176 (1986; Zbl 0592.57009)]: Theorem: The curve complex \(\mathcal{C}(S)\) is homotopy equivalent to a bouquet of spheres \(\bigvee S^n\), where \(n=2g-2\). In the paper under review, motivated by this result, and as a complement to Harer's work, the authors give a proof of the following: Theorem: The curve complex \(\mathcal{C}(S)\) is not contractible, and hence the bouquet \(\bigvee S^n\) in Harer's Theorem contains at least one sphere. Theorem: The curve complex \(\mathcal{C}(S)\) is homotopy equivalent to a countably infinite bouquet of spheres \(\bigvee S^n\), where \(n=2g-2\). An algebraic counterpart of these results is also stated as follows: Theorem: For every non torsion-free subgroup \(\Gamma\) of \(Mod_g\) of finite index, \(\Gamma\) is not a Poincaré duality group. Equivalently, \(Mod_g\) is not a virtual Poincaré duality group. In particular, no subgroup \(\Gamma\) of finite index of \(Mod_g\) can be realized as the fundamental group of a closed aspherical manifold.











This page was built for publication: Infinite topology of curve complexes and non-Poincaré duality of Teichmüller modular groups

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1002487)