Reply to comments of Steuernagel on the Afshar's experiment
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1013692)
Abstract: We respond to criticism of our paper "Paradox in Wave-Paricle Duality for Non-Perturbative Measurements". We disagree with Steuernagel's derivation of the visibility of the Afshar experiment. To calculate the fringe visibility, Steuernagel utilizes two different experimental situations, i.e. the wire grid in the pattern minima and in the pattern maxima. In our assessment, this proceduere cannot lead to the correct result for the complementarity properties of wave-particle in one particular experimental set-up.
Recommendations
- Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity
- Simulation of Afshar's double slit experiment
- Complementarity paradox solved: surprising consequences
- Afshar's experiment does not show a violation of complementarity
- Transcendental versus quantitative meanings of Bohr's complementarity principle
Cites work
Cited in
(7)- Simulation of Afshar's double slit experiment
- Critique of quantum optical experimental refutations of Bohr's principle of complementarity, of the Wootters-Zurek principle of complementarity, and of the particle-wave duality relation
- Understanding modified two-slit experiments using path markers
- Complementarity paradox solved: surprising consequences
- Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity
- Quantum histories and quantum complementarity
- No paradox in wave-particle duality
This page was built for publication: Reply to comments of Steuernagel on the Afshar's experiment
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1013692)
