Transcendental versus quantitative meanings of Bohr's complementarity principle

zbMATH Open1390.81031MaRDI QIDQ5745402FDOQ5745402

Authors: Patricia Kauark-Leite 

Publication date: 5 June 2018

Recommendations

• Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity
• Complementarity revisited
• Welcher weg experiments, duality and the orthodox Bohr's complementarity principle
• Afshar's experiment does not show a violation of complementarity
• Complementarity paradox solved: surprising consequences

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Physics (00A79) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05)

Cited In (19)

• Critique of quantum optical experimental refutations of Bohr's principle of complementarity, of the Wootters-Zurek principle of complementarity, and of the particle-wave duality relation
• Quantum histories and quantum complementarity
• Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity
• Reply to comments of Steuernagel on the Afshar's experiment
• Complementarity of representations in quantum mechanics
• Challenges to Bohr's wave-particle complementarity principle
• Logical analysis of the Bohr complementarity principle in Afshar's experiment under the NAFL interpretation
• Complementarity and quantum tunneling
• Mach-Zehnder interferometer and quantitative complementarity
• Afshar's experiment does not show a violation of complementarity
• Simulation of Afshar's double slit experiment
• Niels Bohr and complementarity. An introduction.
• Refocusing Bohr's quantum postulate
• Bohr's way to defining complementarity
• Bohr's diaphragms
• Welcher weg experiments, duality and the orthodox Bohr's complementarity principle
• The Kantian framework of complementarity
• Beyond complementarity
• Complementarity revisited

This page was built for publication: Transcendental versus quantitative meanings of Bohr's complementarity principle

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5745402)