Finding a tree structure in a resolution proof is NP-complete
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1019749
DOI10.1016/J.TCS.2009.02.018zbMATH Open1166.68038OpenAlexW2032927579MaRDI QIDQ1019749FDOQ1019749
Authors: Jan Hoffmann
Publication date: 28 May 2009
Published in: Theoretical Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2009.02.018
Recommendations
Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17) Mechanization of proofs and logical operations (03B35) Structure of proofs (03F07)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems
- Short proofs are narrow—resolution made simple
- The intractability of resolution
- Minimum propositional proof length is NP-hard to linearly approximate
- Resolution Is Not Automatizable Unless W[P] Is Tractable
- Resolution Trees with Lemmas: Resolution Refinements that Characterize DLL Algorithms with Clause Learning
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Reducibility among combinatorial problems
- Near optimal seperation of tree-like and general resolution
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The NP-hardness of finding a directed acyclic graph for regular resolution
Cited In (6)
This page was built for publication: Finding a tree structure in a resolution proof is NP-complete
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1019749)