Minimum propositional proof length is NP-hard to linearly approximate
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2732273
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1222561
- Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing
- Lower bounds to the size of constant-depth propositional proofs
- Proof mining in \(L_{1}\)-approximation
- Some remarks on lengths of propositional proofs
- Simplified lower bounds for propositional proofs
- Propositional proofs and reductions between NP search problems
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1342249
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1860672
- The Complexity of Propositional Proofs
Cites work
Cited in
(14)- On finding short resolution refutations and small unsatisfiable subsets
- On the hardness of approximating the min-hack problem
- Towards NP-P via proof complexity and search
- Approximation algorithms for the Label-Cover\(_{\text{MAX}}\) and Red-Blue Set Cover problems
- Special issue in memory of Misha Alekhnovich. Foreword
- An upper bound for resolution size: characterization of tractable SAT instances
- Shortening of proof length is elusive for theorem provers
- Finding a tree structure in a resolution proof is NP-complete
- On the automatizability of resolution and related propositional proof systems
- Short Proofs Are Hard to Find
- Pool resolution is NP-hard to recognize
- The NP-hardness of finding a directed acyclic graph for regular resolution
- NP-hardness of approximating meta-complexity: a cryptographic approach
- Cost-optimal planning, delete relaxation, approximability, and heuristics
This page was built for publication: Minimum propositional proof length is NP-hard to linearly approximate
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2732273)