On the sufficiency of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for optimality of the controls in a linear optimal-time problem
autonomous finite-dimensional linear systemsgeneralized gradientsHamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equationoptimal-time control
Existence theories for optimal control problems involving ordinary differential equations (49J15) Fréchet and Gateaux differentiability in optimization (49J50) Optimality conditions for problems involving ordinary differential equations (49K15) Dynamic programming in optimal control and differential games (49L20) Hamilton-Jacobi theories (49L99) Attainable sets, reachability (93B03) Linear systems in control theory (93C05) Model systems in control theory (93C99)
This paper deals with the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation associated with the optimal-time control problem of autonomous finite- dimensional linear systems. Although the principal result established in Theorem 4.2 is true, it is almost useless, because it gives a sufficient condition for a solution of the HJB equation to be the optimal cost function, in terms of the generalized gradients of the optimal cost function itself. In other words, it says that in order to verify whether (or not) a solution of the HJB equation is the desired solution (i.e. the optimal cost function), it is necessary to know previously that desired solution! Also, there are some errors and deficiencies of expression. Among them, the following: 1) The hypothesis that the set of controls U contains 0 in its interior is mentioned between brackets, although that hypothesis is essential to prove that the optimal cost function is Lipschitz-continuous. 2) In (4.2) the correct expression of \(\hat w\) is: \(\hat w(t)=L(t))'\hat w(0)\). 3) In definition 2.2, the expression: ... and E(t) is constant everywhere is confusing, because that property is a consequence of the first part of the definition of maximal controls and not a part of the definition. 4) The correct expression of Theorem 4.1 should be the following: If, for some \(x\in S\), \((\hat w(\cdot),\hat v(\cdot))\) satisfy..., then \(\hat v\) is optimal for P(x).
- Functional analysis and time optimal control
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3167340 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3855833 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3942309 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3724209 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3759010 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 50640 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3505708 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3577861 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3256013 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3261280 (Why is no real title available?)
- Local Optimality Conditions and Lipschitzian Solutions to the Hamilton–Jacobi Equation
- On a generalized Bellman equation for the optimal-time problem
- Minimal time function and viscosity solutions
- Minimal-time functions in problems without local controllability
- Non-uniqueness of solutions of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for time-average control
- Lower semicontinuous solutions of the Bellman equation for the minimum time problem
- A Hamiltonian approach to sufficiency in optimal control with minimal regularity conditions: Part I
This page was built for publication: On the sufficiency of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for optimality of the controls in a linear optimal-time problem
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1079174)