Using two examples for an input correspondence, it is demonstrated that there is no input efficiency measure fulfilling the conditions of \textit{R. Färe} and \textit{C. A. K. Lovell} [ibid. 19, 150-162 (1978; Zbl 0398.90012)] even if strong disposability and/or convexity of level sets is assumed.
Recommendations
Cites work
- An extended Farrell technical efficiency measure
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3848918 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3438613 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3069614 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3083088 (Why is no real title available?)
- Measures of technical efficiency
- Measuring the technical efficiency of production
- Measuring the technical efficiency of production: A comment
- Measuring the technical efficiency of production: Reply
- The Coefficient of Resource Utilization
Cited in
(12)- On the existence of a technical efficiency criterion
- An axiomatic characterization of efficiency indices
- The weighted Russell measure of technical efficiency
- Decomposing capacity utilization in data envelopment analysis: An application to banks in India
- Input-output substitutability and strongly monotonic p-norm least distance DEA measures
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3848918 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the efficiency of the Trimean and Q123
- Response to Lipman and Further Results
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4128629 (Why is no real title available?)
- Input efficiency measures: a generalized, encompassing formulation
- Continuity of measures of technical efficiency
- Measures of technical efficiency
This page was built for publication: On technical efficiency measures: A remark
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1083997)
