Comparison of the single-phase and two-phase numerical model formulation for saturated-unsaturated groundwater flow
Two numerical methods are developed for transient saturated-unsaturated two-dimensional groundwater flow. One formulation uses the usual single- phase formulation with a passive air phase at constant pressure. The second model uses a full two-phase air-water formulation. The numerical results for both formulations are compared on some test problems. In some cases, the single-phase formulation and the two-phase formulations give greatly different results. This can be explained in terms of the fractional flow curve for the air-water system. The single-phase technique generally requires less computational work than the two-phase formulation, although there are some situations where the numerical performance of the single-phase formulation is very poor.
- A Mixed Variational Inequality Boundary Iteration Method for Some Free Boundary Problems
- A Proof of the Convexity of the Free Boundary for Porous Flow Through a Rectangular Dam Using the Maximum Principle
- Dynamics of fluids in porous media.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3177009 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3324629 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3186675 (Why is no real title available?)
- Incomplete Factorization Methods for Fully Implicit Simulation of Enhanced Oil Recovery
- Practical considerations for adaptive implicit methods in reservoir simulation
- Quadratic convergence for cell-centered grids
- The numerical solution of second-order boundary value problems on nonuniform meshes
This page was built for publication: Comparison of the single-phase and two-phase numerical model formulation for saturated-unsaturated groundwater flow
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1094993)