Evaluation and refinement of aspiration-based methods in MCDM

DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00142-8MaRDI QIDQ1124823zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Theodor J. Stewart

Publication date 8 November 2000

Published in European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00142-8

zbMATH Keywords

goal programmingmulti criteria analysisreference point methods

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Multi-objective and goal programming (90C29)

Recommendations

• Aspiration level approach in stochastic MCDM problems
• An Experimental Evaluation of Interactive MCDM Methods and the Decision Making Process
• Multiple criteria decision making with generalized DEA and an aspiration level method
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1149843
• A comparison of two interactive MCDM procedures
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1149840
• Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify
• An aspiration-level interactive model for multiple criteria decision making
• Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques

Cites work

• A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3679573 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1149841 (Why is no real title available?)
• Interactive Sequential Goal Programming
• Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (stem)
• PRIAM, an interactive program for chosing among multiple attribute alternatives
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• Robustness of Additive Value Function Methods in MCDM

Cited in

(5)

• An aspiration-level interactive model for multiple criteria decision making
• Estimating aspiration levels from discrete choices -- computational techniques and experiences
• Consequences of dropping nonessential objectives for the application of MCDM methods
• On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis
• Alternative approach for learning and improving the MCDA method PROAFTN

This page was built for publication: Evaluation and refinement of aspiration-based methods in MCDM

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1124823)