Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques

DOI10.1016/0377-2217(95)00326-6MaRDI QIDQ1278710zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors James Corner, John Buchanan

Publication date 27 April 1999

Published in European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00326-6

zbMATH Keywords

experimentmulticriteria analysiscontinuous decision variablesdecision making under certaintymultiple, conflicting objectives

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Recommendations

• Experimental consideration of preference in decision making under certainty
• An Experimental Evaluation of Interactive MCDM Methods and the Decision Making Process
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3894850
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4204104

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2086188 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4085440 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 40987 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3304536 (Why is no real title available?)
• A comparative study of multiattribute decision making methodologies
• An Experimental Evaluation of Interactive MCDM Methods and the Decision Making Process
• An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility Functions
• Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques
• Characteristics of Decisions in Decision Analysis Practice
• Cognitive validity in design of decision‐aiding techniques
• Experimental consideration of preference in decision making under certainty
• The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice

Cited in

(13)

• Evaluation and refinement of aspiration-based methods in MCDM
• A comparison of two interactive MCDM procedures
• Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques
• An evaluation of multi‐criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy
• MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state‐owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences
• Pairwise comparisons or constrained optimization? A usability evaluation of techniques for eliciting decision priorities
• Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method
• Experimental consideration of preference in decision making under certainty
• Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods
• A comparison of two reference point methods in multiple objective mathematical programming.
• Comparing reference point based interactive multiobjective optimization methods without a human decision maker
• User acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: the impact of preference elicitation techniques
• Defining preferences and reference points -- a multiple criteria decision making experiment

This page was built for publication: Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1278710)