Optimization and external reference; a comparison of three axiomatic systems

DOI10.1016/S0165-1765(97)81880-0MaRDI QIDQ1127377zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Yongsheng Xu, Wulf Gaertner

Publication date 13 August 1998

Published in Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

rationalizabilitynormschoice functionsexternal references

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• Axiomatization for approximate solutions in optimization.
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1383083
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1086755
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5520421
• A Systematic Approach to Higher-Order Necessary Conditions in Optimization Theory
• Axiomatic approach to approximate solutions in multiobjective optimization
• Axiomatic approach to duality in optimization
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 177392
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3985648
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4068623

Cites work

• Internal Consistency of Choice
• Never choose the uniquely largest. A characterization
• On rationalizability of choice functions: a characterization of the median
• Path Independence, Rationality, and Social Choice
• Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination

Cited in

(2)

• Justification within and between social contexts with the possibility of choice deferral
• Rationality, external norms, and the epistemic value of menus

This page was built for publication: Optimization and external reference; a comparison of three axiomatic systems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1127377)