The monadic theory of (_ 2,<) may be complicated
It would be an ill-posed problem to ask for a characterization of those sets \(B\subseteq\omega\) which are recursive is the monadic theory of \((\omega_ 2,\leq)\). In fact, a classical result of \textit{Y. Gurevich, M. Magidor} and \textit{S. Shelah} [J. Symb. Log. 48, 387-398 (1983; Zbl 0549.03010)] states that under the assumption of the existence of a weakly compact cardinal in the universe \(V\) of set theory, for every subset \(B\) of \(\omega\) there is a generic extension \(W\) of \(V\) in which \(B\) is recursive in the monadic theory of \((\omega_ 2,\leq)\). Of course \(W\) depends on \(B\). In the present paper the same conclusion is obtained without the assumption of the existence of large cardinals. More precisely, the following main theorem is proved. There is a set of sentences \(\{\theta_ n; n\in\omega\}\) in the monadic language of order such that: if \(V\) satisfies the GCH, then for each \(B\subseteq\omega\) there exists a forcing notion \(P\) which is \(\omega_ 1\)-closed, satisfies the \(\omega_ 3\)-chain condition, preserves cardinals, cofinalities and the GCH, \(| P|=\aleph_ 3\), such that \(P\) forces \(B=\{n; (\omega_ 2,\leq)\models\theta_ n\}\).
- The monadic theory of ω2
- Provident sets and rudimentary set forcing
- Where do sets come from?
- DETERMINISTIC AUTOMATA AND THE MONADIC THEORY OF ORDINALS < ω2
- Continuous relations and generalized G_δ sets
- Definability and forcing in E-recursion.
- AXIOMATIZATION OF THE MONADIC THEORY OF ORDINALS < ω2
- Uncountable cardinals have the same monadic ∀11positive theory over large sets
- Interpreting second-order logic in the monadic theory of order
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4010510
- The monadic theory and the next world
- Notes on monadic logic. A: Monadic theory of the real line
- Monadic theory of a linear order versus the theory of its subsets with the lifted min/max operations
- The monadic theory of ω2
- AXIOMATIZATION OF THE MONADIC THEORY OF ORDINALS < ω2
- Uncountable cardinals have the same monadic ∀11positive theory over large sets
This page was built for publication: The monadic theory of \((\omega{}_ 2,<)\) may be complicated
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1190619)