Why ethical measures of inequality need interpersonal comparisons
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1241162
DOI10.1007/BF00135081zbMath0364.90014MaRDI QIDQ1241162
Publication date: 1976
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Related Items
Generic properties of simple Bergson-Samuelson welfare functions, Welfare, preference and freedom, Welfarism on economic domains, Factual versus representational utilities and their interdimensional comparisons, The news of the death of welfare economics is greatly exaggerated, Beyond pareto optimality: The necessity of interpersonal cardinal utilities in distributional judgements and social choice
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Rawls versus Bentham: An axiomatic examination of the pure distribution problem
- Bentham or Bergson? Finite Sensibility, Utility Functions and Social Welfare Functions
- Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle
- An Impossibility Theorem for Fixed Preferences: A Dictatorial Bergson- Samuelson Welfare Function