On the Thomae formula for Z_N curves
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1265296
Abstract: We shall give an elementary and rigorous proof of the Thomae formula for curves which was discovered by Bershadsky and Radul. Instead of using the determinant of the Laplacian we use the traditional variational method which goes back to Riemann, Thomae, Fuchs. In the proof we made explicit the algebraic expression of the chiral Szeg"{o} kernels and proves the vanishing of zero values of derivatives of theta functions with invariant characteristics.
Recommendations
Cited in
(18)- Fermionic fields on \({\mathbb{Z}}_ N\)-curves
- Generalized Weierstrass kernels on the intersection of two complex hypersurfaces
- General derivative Thomae formula for singular half-periods
- Thomae's derivative formulae for trigonal curves
- Thomae formulae for general fully ramified \(Z_n\) curves
- Thomae type formulae for singular \(Z_N\) curves
- Generalizations of Hutchinson's curve and the Thomae formulae
- Estimation for entanglement negativity of free fermions
- An elementary proof of Thomae's formulae
- On Thomae formulas for \(\mathbb Z_3\) curves
- Rosenhain-Thomae formulae for higher genera hyperelliptic curves
- Thomae formula for abelian covers of ℂℙ¹
- A new proof of a Thomae-like formula for non hyperelliptic genus 3 curves
- THETA CONSTANT IDENTITIES AT PERIODS OF COVERINGS OF DEGREE 3
- Thomae formula for general cyclic covers of \({{\mathbb {CP}}^1}\)
- Generalizations of Thomae's formula for Z_n curves
- Thomae's formula for \(Z_n\) curves
- \({\mathbb{Z}_N}\)-curves possessing no thomae formulae of Bershadsky-Radul type
This page was built for publication: On the Thomae formula for \(\mathbb{Z}_N\) curves
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1265296)