Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ``scope test? A meta-analysis

DOI10.1006/JEEM.1996.0045zbMATH Open0908.90077OpenAlexW1987422726MaRDI QIDQ1267673FDOQ1267673

Authors: V. Kerry Smith, Laura L. Osborne 

Publication date: 5 November 1998

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0045

Recommendations

• Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation
• The scope trials: variation in sensitivity to scope and WTP with directionally bounded utility functions
• The case for diminishing marginal existence values

zbMATH Keywords

internal consistencywillingness to paycontingent valuation estimates

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76) Consumer behavior, demand theory (91B42)

Cited In (6)

• In search of valid results in a complex economic environment: The potential of meta-analysis and value transfer
• Testing for consistency in contingent ranking experiments.
• On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity.
• Estimating discount rates for environmental quality from utility-based choice experiments
• Meta-analysis and benefit transfer for resource valuation-addressing classical challenges with Bayesian modeling
• Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation

This page was built for publication: Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ``scope test? A meta-analysis

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1267673)