Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ``scope test? A meta-analysis

DOI10.1006/JEEM.1996.0045MaRDI QIDQ1267673zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors V. Kerry Smith, Laura L. Osborne

Publication date 5 November 1998

Published in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0045

zbMATH Keywords

contingent valuation estimatesinternal consistencywillingness to pay

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Consumer behavior, demand theory (91B42) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76)

Recommendations

• Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation
• The scope trials: variation in sensitivity to scope and WTP with directionally bounded utility functions
• The case for diminishing marginal existence values

Cited in

(11)

• Estimating discount rates for environmental quality from utility-based choice experiments
• Testing the internal consistency of contingent valuation surveys
• Embedding in market demand systems
• On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation. I: Caveat investigator
• The case for diminishing marginal existence values
• On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity.
• In search of valid results in a complex economic environment: The potential of meta-analysis and value transfer
• Testing for consistency in contingent ranking experiments.
• Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 970019 (Why is no real title available?)
• Meta-analysis and benefit transfer for resource valuation-addressing classical challenges with Bayesian modeling

This page was built for publication: Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ``scope test? A meta-analysis

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1267673)