The scope trials: variation in sensitivity to scope and WTP with directionally bounded utility functions

DOI10.1016/J.JEEM.2009.06.003zbMATH Open1194.91137OpenAlexW1980214057MaRDI QIDQ994094FDOQ994094

Authors: Edoh Y. Amiran, Daniel A. Hagen 

Publication date: 17 September 2010

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.06.003

Recommendations

• An experimental test of a general class of utility models: Evidence for context dependency
• Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation
• Sensitivity of decisions with imprecise utility trade-off parameters using boundary linear utility
• Interval scalability of rank-dependent utility
• Testing descriptive utility theories: Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence
• A reconsideration of the (in)sensitivity of tests of the intertemporal allocation of consumption to near rational alternatives
• Revealed preference tests for consistency with weakly separable indirect utility
• Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data

zbMATH Keywords

contingent valuationsubstitutionwillingness to payconsumer utilitysensitivity to scope

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76) Utility theory (91B16) Consumer behavior, demand theory (91B42)

Cites Work

• Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation

Cited In (3)

• Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation.
• On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity.
• Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation

This page was built for publication: The scope trials: variation in sensitivity to scope and WTP with directionally bounded utility functions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q994094)