Comparison of shape design sensitivity analysis formulations via material derivative-adjoint variable and implicit differentiation techniques for 3-D and 2-D curved boundary element

DOI10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01123-1zbMath0893.73040MaRDI QIDQ1371722

J. Ning

Publication date: 30 August 1998

Published in: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

numerical integration; BEA models

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

65K10: Numerical optimization and variational techniques

74S15: Boundary element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics

74P99: Optimization problems in solid mechanics

Related Items

Theoretical and computational aspects of the stochastic boundary element method

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A boundary element approach for recovery of shape sensitivities in three- dimensional elastic solids
• Variational approach by means of adjoint systems to structural optimization and sensitivity analysis. II. Structure shape variation
• The boundary element formulation for multiparameter structural shape optimization
• Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems
• Three-dimensional boundary element thermal shape sensitivity analysis
• Three dimensional boundary formulations for nonlinear thermal shape sensitivities
• Applications of BEM in sensitivity analysis and optimization
• Shape design sensitivity analysis for non-linear anisotropic heat conducting solids and shape optimization by the BEM
• First- and second-order sensitivity analysis of linear and nonlinearstructures
• Boundary integral equation method for shape optimization of elastic structures
• Boundary-element shape sensitivity analysis for thermal problems with nonlinear boundary conditions
• Symmetric Galerkin boundary formulations employing curved elements
• Shape design sensitivity analysis via material derivative‐adjoint variable technique for 3‐D and 2‐D curved boundary elements