The relation between J_D and J_M for the centre cracked tension specimen geometry

DOI10.1016/0020-7225(95)00005-IzbMATH Open0899.73420WikidataQ128132575 ScholiaQ128132575MaRDI QIDQ1385697FDOQ1385697

Authors: D. Massart 

Publication date: 15 November 1998

Published in: International Journal of Engineering Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Recommendations

• The difference between the \(J_D\) and \(J_M\) crack growth resistance curves for a tensile loading situation
• The \(J_ M\) crack growth resistance curve expressed in terms of eta factors
• The \(J_M\) crack growth resistance curve expressed in terms of eta factors: Analysis of some idealized models
• \(J\) integral solutions for a general bending-tension model

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fracture and damage (74R99)

Cites Work

• The use of eta factors to describe the plastic contribution to the \(J\)- integral
• The relation between the magnitudes of \(J_ D\) and \(J_ M\) for test specimen geometrical configurations
• The plastic component of the deformation \(J\)-integral for a stationary crack: The small-scale yielding situation

Cited In (2)

• The \(J_ M\) crack growth resistance curve expressed in terms of eta factors
• Relationship between incremental \(J\) integral and crack tip opening angle in elastic plastic materials

This page was built for publication: The relation between \(J_D\) and \(J_M\) for the centre cracked tension specimen geometry

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1385697)