The relation between J_D and J_M for the centre cracked tension specimen geometry

DOI10.1016/0020-7225(95)00005-IMaRDI QIDQ1385697zbMATH OpenWikidataFDO

Authors D. Massart

Publication date 15 November 1998

Published in International Journal of Engineering Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fracture and damage (74R99)

Recommendations

• The difference between the \(J_D\) and \(J_M\) crack growth resistance curves for a tensile loading situation
• The \(J_ M\) crack growth resistance curve expressed in terms of eta factors
• The \(J_M\) crack growth resistance curve expressed in terms of eta factors: Analysis of some idealized models
• \(J\) integral solutions for a general bending-tension model

Cites work

• The plastic component of the deformation \(J\)-integral for a stationary crack: The small-scale yielding situation
• The relation between the magnitudes of \(J_ D\) and \(J_ M\) for test specimen geometrical configurations
• The use of eta factors to describe the plastic contribution to the \(J\)- integral

Cited in

(2)

• Relationship between incremental \(J\) integral and crack tip opening angle in elastic plastic materials
• The \(J_ M\) crack growth resistance curve expressed in terms of eta factors

This page was built for publication: The relation between \(J_D\) and \(J_M\) for the centre cracked tension specimen geometry

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1385697)