The relation between the magnitudes of J_ D and J_ M for test specimen geometrical configurations

DOI10.1016/0020-7225(93)90130-MzbMATH Open0780.73060OpenAlexW2025971262MaRDI QIDQ689989FDOQ689989

M. C. Fu

Publication date: 20 December 1993

Published in: International Journal of Engineering Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(93)90130-m

zbMATH Keywords

tensile loading\(J_ D\) resistance curve\(J_ M\) resistance curveligament width

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fracture and damage (74R99)

Cites Work

• The use of eta factors to describe the plastic contribution to the \(J\)- integral

Cited In (3)

• The relation between \(J_D\) and \(J_M\) for the centre cracked tension specimen geometry
• The difference between the \(J_D\) and \(J_M\) crack growth resistance curves for a tensile loading situation
• A comparison of the \(J_ D\) and \(J_ M\) crack growth resistance curves for small-scale yielding conditions and the relevance to the integrity assessment of a cracked engineering structure

This page was built for publication: The relation between the magnitudes of \(J_ D\) and \(J_ M\) for test specimen geometrical configurations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q689989)