A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: Comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum.
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1398347
Recommendations
- Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum
- Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method
- Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty
- Induced-value tests of the referendum voting mechanism
- Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
Cited in
(8)- Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
- Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: Application to global climate change using national internet samples.
- Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method
- Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation
- Valuation of in-stream water quality improvement via fuzzy contingent valuation method
- Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2217282 (Why is no real title available?)
- Induced-value tests of the referendum voting mechanism
This page was built for publication: A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: Comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1398347)
