Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method

DOI10.1006/JEEM.1995.1033MaRDI QIDQ1815778zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Abdelmoneim H. Elnagheeb, Jeffrey L. Jordan

Publication date 21 April 1997

Published in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1033

zbMATH Keywords

non-market valuationMonte Carlo willingness-to-payreferendum contingent valuation method

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistical methods; economic indices and measures (91B82) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76) Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets) (91B24)

Recommendations

• A note on consistent estimation of mean WTP using a misspecified logit contingent valuation model
• A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: Comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum.
• Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty

Cited in

(3)

• Some advances in optimal designs in contingent valuation studies
• A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: Comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum.
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1747144 (Why is no real title available?)

This page was built for publication: Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1815778)