Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method

DOI10.1006/JEEM.1995.1033zbMATH Open0860.90030OpenAlexW2028101272MaRDI QIDQ1815778FDOQ1815778

Authors: Abdelmoneim H. Elnagheeb, Jeffrey L. Jordan 

Publication date: 21 April 1997

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1033

Recommendations

• A note on consistent estimation of mean WTP using a misspecified logit contingent valuation model
• A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: Comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum.
• Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty

zbMATH Keywords

non-market valuationMonte Carlo willingness-to-payreferendum contingent valuation method

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistical methods; economic indices and measures (91B82) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76) Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets) (91B24)

Cited In (3)

• Some advances in optimal designs in contingent valuation studies
• A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: Comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum.
• Title not available (Why is that?)

This page was built for publication: Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1815778)