On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. I, II.
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1441753)
Die Verf. behandeln die Frage, wann es als wahrscheinlich zu gelten hat, daß\ eine bestimmte beobachtete Stichprobe eine zufällige Auswahl aus einer Population mit bekanntem Verteilungsgesetz darstellt. Zu diesem Behuf wird die Stichprobe als ein Punkt in einem vieldimensionierten Raum dargestellt. Das Kriterium für die Annahme einer bestimmten Hypothese über die zugrunde liegende Population fährt auf Flächen in diesem Raum, deren Dichte nach dem vermuteten Verteilungsgesetz bestimmt wird. Betrachtet werden die \textit{Gauß}sche, die konstante und die exponentielle Verteilung.
Cited in
(40)- Discrepancy between structured matrices in the power analysis of a separability test
- Bayesian and frequentist testing for differences between two groups with parametric and nonparametric two-sample tests
- A Robust Generalization of the Rao Test
- Price predictability at ultra-high frequency: entropy-based randomness test
- A Bayesian multi-factorial design and analysis for estimating combined effects of multiple interventions in a pragmatic clinical trial to improve dementia care
- Generalized C() tests with nonstandard convergence rates
- Being Bayesian in the 2020s: opportunities and challenges in the practice of modern applied Bayesian statistics
- A review of multivariate permutation tests: findings and trends
- Likelihood-free frequentist inference: bridging classical statistics and machine learning for reliable simulator-based inference
- Author's reply to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Priyantha Wijayatunga's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Ruodu Wang's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Paul Vos's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Judith Ter Schure's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Stephen Senn's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Jorge Mateu's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Ryan Martin's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Nick Longford's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Tze Leung Lai and Anna Choi's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Kuldeep Kumar's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Chloe Krakauer and Kenneth Rice's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Sander Greenland's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Christine P. Chai's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- A distillation of the live chat during the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Christian Hennig's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Vladimir Vovk's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Arthur Paul Pedersen's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Xiao-Li Meng's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Peter D. Grünwald's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Aaditya Ramdas's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Barbara Osimani's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Harry Crane's contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication' by Glenn Shafer
- Seconder of the vote of thanks to Glenn Shafer and contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication'
- Proposer of the vote of thanks to Glenn Shafer and contribution to the discussion of `Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication'
- Testing by betting: a strategy for statistical and scientific communication
- Type-1 beta distribution and its connections to likelihood ratio test
- A brief review of the research work of C R Rao
- A joint model for graded responses and response times
- On admissibility in post-hoc hypothesis testing
- An empirical power comparison of directional goodness-of-fit tests for 2-PL IRT model under different intercept patterns
This page was built for publication: On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. I, II.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1441753)
