Why the cosmological constant problem is hard

From MaRDI portal

DOI10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00901-1zbMATH Open1050.83514arXivhep-th/0006059OpenAlexW3101430134WikidataQ125967184 ScholiaQ125967184MaRDI QIDQ1579412FDOQ1579412


Authors: N. Delaunay Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 6 September 2000

Published in: Physics Letters B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We consider a recent proposal to solve the cosmological constant problem within the context of brane world scenarios with infinite volume extra dimensions. In such theories bulk can be supersymmetric even if brane supersymmetry is completely broken. The bulk cosmological constant can therefore naturally be zero. Since the volume of the extra dimensions is infinite, it might appear that at large distances one would measure the bulk cosmological constant which vanishes. We point out a caveat in this argument. In particular, we use a concrete model, which is a generalization of the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model, to argue that in the presence of non-zero brane cosmological constant at large distances such a theory might become effectively four dimensional. This is due to a mass gap in the spectrum of bulk graviton modes. In fact, the corresponding distance scale is set precisely by the brane cosmological constant. This phenomenon appears to be responsible for the fact that bulk supersymmetry does not actually protect the brane cosmological constant.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0006059




Recommendations





Cited In (17)





This page was built for publication: Why the cosmological constant problem is hard

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1579412)