A comparison of second- and sixth-order methods for large eddy simulations
DOI10.1016/S0045-7930(01)00073-1zbMath1027.76025MaRDI QIDQ1598035
Matthias Meinke, Wolfgang Schröder, Egon Krause, Th. Rister
Publication date: 4 January 2004
Published in: Computers and Fluids (Search for Journal in Brave)
large eddy simulationchannel flowsflow past cylinderadvective upstream splitting methodinviscid fluxescompact Padé methodsdynamical subgrid scale modelhigh-frequency filterplanar turbulent jetsecond-order mixed central-upwind schemeturbulent compressive flows
Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics (76M20) Shear flows and turbulence (76F10) Gas dynamics (general theory) (76N15) Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulence (76F65)
Related Items (59)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows
- Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution
- A new flux splitting scheme
- Effects of the computational time step on numerical solutions of turbulent flow
- Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method
- Numerical simulation of the turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard problem using subgrid modelling
- Toward the large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows
- A dynamic subgrid-scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport
- A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model
- Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number
This page was built for publication: A comparison of second- and sixth-order methods for large eddy simulations