Is \(R_0\) a good predictor of final epidemic size: foot-and-mouth disease in the UK

DOI10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.02.019zbMath1402.92414OpenAlexW2017842991WikidataQ33955552 ScholiaQ33955552MaRDI QIDQ1624244

Michael J. Tildesley, Matthew J. Keeling

Publication date: 16 November 2018

Published in: Journal of Theoretical Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2895684

zbMATH Keywords

spatialmodellingstochasticfoot and mouth

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Epidemiology (92D30) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Related Items (5)

The final size of an epidemic and its relation to the basic reproduction number ⋮ The most efficient critical vaccination coverage and its equivalence with maximizing the herd effect ⋮ The failure of \(R_{0}\) ⋮ Influence of non-homogeneous mixing on final epidemic size in a meta-population model ⋮ What the reproductive number \(\mathcal{R}_0\) can and cannot tell us about COVID-19 dynamics

Cites Work

• On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio \(R_ 0\) in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations
• Signatures of non-homogeneous mixing in disease outbreaks
• Percolation on heterogeneous networks as a model for epidemics
• The implications of network structure for epidemic dynamics
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Is \(R_0\) a good predictor of final epidemic size: foot-and-mouth disease in the UK