Comparison of turbulence closures for optimized active control

DOI10.1016/J.COMPFLUID.2015.10.011zbMath1390.76251OpenAlexW2198383104MaRDI QIDQ1646696

Jérémie Labroquère, Emmanuel Guilmineau, Régis Duvigneau

Publication date: 26 June 2018

Published in: Computers and Fluids (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01251823/file/CF_2016_duvigneau.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

optimizationturbulenceflow control

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Flow control and optimization for incompressible viscous fluids (76D55) Control of turbulent flows (76F70)

Related Items (1)

Parametric Optimization of Pulsating Jets in Unsteady Flow by Multiple-Gradient Descent Algorithm (MGDA)

Cites Work

• An interface capturing method for free-surface hydrodynamic flows
• The numerical computation of turbulent flows
• Active control and drag optimization for flow past a circular cylinder. I: Oscillatory cylinder rotation
• Design and analysis of computer experiments. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces
• Evaluation of the unsteady RANS capabilities for separated flows control
• Optimization of a synthetic jet actuator for aerodynamic stall control
• Influence from numerical noise in the objective function for flow design optimisation
• On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows
• Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step

This page was built for publication: Comparison of turbulence closures for optimized active control