Strategic dialogical argumentation using multi-criteria decision making with application to epistemic and emotional aspects of arguments

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-90050-6_12OpenAlexW2800445203MaRDI QIDQ1647490FDOQ1647490

Authors: Emmanuel Hadoux, Anthony Hunter, Jean-Baptiste Corrégé 

Publication date: 26 June 2018

Full work available at URL: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10047348/

Recommendations

• On the use of argumentation for multiple criteria decision making
• Empirical evaluation of strategies for multiparty argumentative debates
• Argumentation based dynamic multiple criteria decision making
• Argumentation-Based Multi-agent Dialogues for Deliberation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cited In (7)

• Empirical evaluation of strategies for multiparty argumentative debates
• Investigating strategic considerations in persuasion dialogue games
• Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games
• Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules
• Approximating agreements in formal argumentation dialogues
• An argument-based framework for selecting dialogue move types and content
• Irrationality in persuasive argumentation

This page was built for publication: Strategic dialogical argumentation using multi-criteria decision making with application to epistemic and emotional aspects of arguments

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1647490)