Abstract: Pareto distributions, and power laws in general, have demonstrated to be very useful models to describe very different phenomena, from physics to finance. In recent years, the econophysical literature has proposed a large amount of papers and models justifying the presence of power laws in economic data. Most of the times, this Paretianity is inferred from the observation of some plots, such as the Zipf plot and the mean excess plot. If the Zipf plot looks almost linear, then everything is ok and the parameters of the Pareto distribution are estimated. Often with OLS. Unfortunately, as we show in this paper, these heuristic graphical tools are not reliable. To be more exact, we show that only a combination of plots can give some degree of confidence about the real presence of Paretianity in the data. We start by reviewing some of the most important plots, discussing their points of strength and weakness, and then we propose some additional tools that can be used to refine the analysis.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1026574 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3338262 (Why is no real title available?)
- A discussion on mean excess plots
- Cross-correlations between volume change and price change
- Laws of small numbers: extremes and rare events.
- Modeling Income Distributions and Lorenz Curves
- On testing extreme value conditions
- Parametric Lorenz Curves: Models and Applications
- Power-law distributions in empirical data
- Rank -1/2: a simple way to improve the OLS estimation of tail exponents
- Scale-Free Networks
- Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences
Cited in
(21)- On the parametric description of log-growth rates of Romanian city sizes
- A generalization of the power law distribution with nonlinear exponent
- Rank -1/2: a simple way to improve the OLS estimation of tail exponents
- The testing of Pareto distributions
- A graphical test for local self-similarity in univariate data
- Strong, weak and false inverse power laws
- Gini estimation under infinite variance
- The Pareto, Zipf and other power laws
- On the statistical properties and tail risk of violent conflicts
- On the statistical properties of viral misinformation in online social media
- Expected shortfall estimation for apparently infinite-mean models of operational risk
- On the identification of extreme outliers and dragon-kings mechanisms in the upper tail of income distribution
- From concentration profiles to concentration maps. New tools for the study of loss distributions
- Is the wealth of the Forbes 400 lists really Pareto distributed?
- How much better is disaggregate data?
- Graphical representations and associated goodness-of-fit tests for Pareto and log-normal distributions based on inequality curves
- Five degrees of randomness
- Dynamical fitness models: evidence of universality classes for preferential attachment graphs
- The distribution of strike size: empirical evidence from Europe and north America in the 19th and 20th centuries
- A unified approach of testing for discrete and continuous Pareto laws
- A robust semi-parametric approach for measuring income inequality in Malaysia
This page was built for publication: Are your data really Pareto distributed?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1673333)
