How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of dictator and ultimatum games
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1712136
Recommendations
- Are individuals more generous in loss contexts?
- Non-acceptance of Losses—An Experimental Study on the Importance of the Sign of Final Outcomes in Ultimatum Bargaining
- Bargaining over losses
- Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games
- Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48701 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 679839 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining
- Asymmetric outside options in ultimatum bargaining: a systematic analysis
- Bargaining over losses
- Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact?
- Fairness in simple bargaining experiments
- From windfall sharing to property ownership: prosocial personality traits in giving and taking dictator games
- Non-acceptance of Losses—An Experimental Study on the Importance of the Sign of Final Outcomes in Ultimatum Bargaining
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
- The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games
- Theory of mind and general intelligence in dictator and ultimatum games
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of dictator and ultimatum games
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1712136)