How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of dictator and ultimatum games
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1712136
DOI10.3390/G9040078zbMATH Open1419.91197OpenAlexW2895579400MaRDI QIDQ1712136FDOQ1712136
Authors: Peng Zhang 
Publication date: 21 January 2019
Published in: Games (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g9040078
Recommendations
- Are individuals more generous in loss contexts?
- Non-acceptance of Losses—An Experimental Study on the Importance of the Sign of Final Outcomes in Ultimatum Bargaining
- Bargaining over losses
- Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games
- Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- Asymmetric outside options in ultimatum bargaining: a systematic analysis
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
- Fairness in simple bargaining experiments
- Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact?
- Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining
- The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Theory of mind and general intelligence in dictator and ultimatum games
- Bargaining over losses
- From windfall sharing to property ownership: prosocial personality traits in giving and taking dictator games
- Non-acceptance of Losses—An Experimental Study on the Importance of the Sign of Final Outcomes in Ultimatum Bargaining
Cited In (5)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of dictator and ultimatum games
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1712136)
