An operationalist perspective on setting dependence
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1735932
DOI10.1007/S10701-019-00243-5zbMATH Open1411.81065OpenAlexW2916480226MaRDI QIDQ1735932FDOQ1735932
Authors: Ronnie Hermens 
Publication date: 29 March 2019
Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-019-00243-5
Recommendations
- Bell's theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism
- Constraints on determinism: Bell versus Conway-Kochen
- Supermeasured: violating Bell-statistical independence without violating physical statistical independence
- Context independence as a statistical property of hidden variable theories
- Non-local setting and outcome information for violation of Bell's inequality
General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations (81P40)
Cites Work
- Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Nonlocality without nonlocality
- The free will theorem
- Measurement and collapse within the two-state vector formalism
- The cellular automaton interpretation of quantum mechanics
- The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
- Monogamy of correlations versus monogamy of entanglement
- Quantum logic, realism, and value definiteness
- On predictions in retro-causal interpretations of quantum mechanics
- Quantum Bayesianism: a study
- What does the free will theorem actually prove?
- Constraints on determinism: Bell versus Conway-Kochen
- On the notion of free will in the Free Will Theorem
- Foundations of quantum theory. From classical concepts to operator algebras
- Bell's theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism
- Can the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics solve the measurement problem?
- Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
Cited In (5)
- Completely real? A critical note on the claims by Colbeck and Renner
- Bell's theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism
- How real are quantum states in \(\psi \)-ontic models?
- Randomness? What randomness?
- Invariant set theory: violating measurement independence without fine tuning, conspiracy, constraints on free will or retrocausality
This page was built for publication: An operationalist perspective on setting dependence
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1735932)
