An operationalist perspective on setting dependence

DOI10.1007/S10701-019-00243-5MaRDI QIDQ1735932zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Ronnie Hermens

Publication date 29 March 2019

Published in Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-019-00243-5

zbMATH Keywords

Bell's theoremfree willsuperdeterminismretro-causalitysetting independence

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations (81P40)

Recommendations

• Bell's theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism
• Constraints on determinism: Bell versus Conway-Kochen
• Supermeasured: violating Bell-statistical independence without violating physical statistical independence
• Context independence as a statistical property of hidden variable theories
• Non-local setting and outcome information for violation of Bell's inequality

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5503131 (Why is no real title available?)
• Bell's theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism
• Can the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics solve the measurement problem?
• Constraints on determinism: Bell versus Conway-Kochen
• Foundations of quantum theory. From classical concepts to operator algebras
• Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
• Measurement and collapse within the two-state vector formalism
• Monogamy of correlations versus monogamy of entanglement
• Nonlocality without nonlocality
• On predictions in retro-causal interpretations of quantum mechanics
• On the notion of free will in the Free Will Theorem
• Quantum Bayesianism: a study
• Quantum logic, realism, and value definiteness
• Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics
• The cellular automaton interpretation of quantum mechanics
• The free will theorem
• The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
• What does the free will theorem actually prove?

Cited in

(5)

• Completely real? A critical note on the claims by Colbeck and Renner
• Bell's theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism
• How real are quantum states in -ontic models?
• Randomness? What randomness?
• Invariant set theory: violating measurement independence without fine tuning, conspiracy, constraints on free will or retrocausality

This page was built for publication: An operationalist perspective on setting dependence

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1735932)