Assessment of uncertainties in hot-wire anemometry and oil-film interferometry measurements for wall-bounded turbulent flows
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1784584
DOI10.1016/J.EUROMECHFLU.2018.04.012zbMATH Open1408.76298arXiv1804.09263OpenAlexW2799077307WikidataQ131461295 ScholiaQ131461295MaRDI QIDQ1784584FDOQ1784584
M. Liefvendahl, R. Vinuesa, Saleh Rezaeiravesh, P. Schlatter
Publication date: 27 September 2018
Published in: European Journal of Mechanics. B. Fluids (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: In this study, the sources of uncertainty of hot-wire anemometry (HWA) and oil-film interferometry (OFI) measurements are assessed. Both statistical and classical methods are used for the forward and inverse problems, so that the contributions to the overall uncertainty of the measured quantities can be evaluated. The correlations between the parameters are taken into account through the Bayesian inference with error-in-variable (EiV) model. In the forward problem, very small differences were found when using Monte Carlo (MC), Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) and linear perturbation methods. In flow velocity measurements with HWA, the results indicate that the estimated uncertainty is lower when the correlations among parameters are considered, than when they are not taken into account. Moreover, global sensitivity analyses with Sobol indices showed that the HWA measurements are most sensitive to the wire voltage, and in the case of OFI the most sensitive factor is the calculation of fringe velocity. The relative errors in wall-shear stress, friction velocity and viscous length are 0.44%, 0.23% and 0.22%, respectively. Note that these values are lower than the ones reported in other wall-bounded turbulence studies. Note that in most studies of wall-bounded turbulence the correlations among parameters are not considered, and the uncertainties from the various parameters are directly added when determining the overall uncertainty of the measured quantity. In the present analysis we account for these correlations, which may lead to a lower overall uncertainty estimate due to error cancellation. Furthermore, our results also indicate that the crucial aspect when obtaining accurate inner-scaled velocity measurements is the wind-tunnel flow quality, which is more critical than the accuracy in wall-shear stress measurements.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09263
Recommendations
- Systematic errors of skin-friction measurements by oil-film interferometry
- Evaluation of the basic systems of equations for turbulence measurements using the Monte Carlo technique
- Enhancing the accuracy of measurement techniques in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers for more representative comparison to their canonical representations
- Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1528046
Monte Carlo methods (65C05) Statistical turbulence modeling (76F55) Turbulent boundary layers (76F40)
Cites Work
- Bayesian data analysis.
- Bayesian calibration of computer models. (With discussion)
- A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code
- Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates
- The Wiener--Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Evaluating the law of the wall in two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flows
- Variations of von Kármán coefficient in canonical flows
- On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence
- Comparison of mean flow similarity laws in zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers
- A note on the overlap region in turbulent boundary layers
- PARALLEL ADAPTIVE MULTILEVEL SAMPLING ALGORITHMS FOR THE BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS
- Bayesian Analysis of Errors-in-Variables Regression Models
- Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow
- Further observations on the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow
- Spatial resolution correction for wall-bounded turbulence measurements
- Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence
- Criteria for assessing experiments in zero pressure gradient boundary layers
- Enhancing the accuracy of measurement techniques in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers for more representative comparison to their canonical representations
- On the identification of well-behaved turbulent boundary layers
- A note on the intermediate region in turbulent boundary layers
- History effects and near equilibrium in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers
- Obtaining accurate mean velocity measurements in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers using Pitot tubes
- Measurement and probability. A probabilistic theory of measurement with applications
- Cascades in wall-bounded turbulence
- Turbulent boundary layers over flat plates and rotating disks -- the legacy of von Kármán: a Stockholm perspective
- Systematic errors of skin-friction measurements by oil-film interferometry
Cited In (1)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Assessment of uncertainties in hot-wire anemometry and oil-film interferometry measurements for wall-bounded turbulent flows
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1784584)
