Potential welfare and the sum of individual compensating or equivalent variations
We investigate under which conditions the sign of the sum of both the individual compensating and equivalent variations correctly indicates changes in potential welfare. Our results reproduce exactly those of \textit{J. S. Chipman} and \textit{J. C. Moore} [Econometrica 48, 401-422 (1980)] for the National Income Test, which did not rely on individual measures of welfare directly related to consumers' preferences: (i) a necessary and sufficient condition for the new test to be valid is that individual preferences are identical and homothetic; and (ii) if the distribution of income is constant and preferences are homothetic, then the new test is valid only if preferences are also identical.
- On the relationship between the Hicksian measures of change in welfare and the Pareto principle
- Welfare variations and the comparative statics of demand
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4200007 (Why is no real title available?)
- A RULE FOR AGGREGATING INDIVIDUAL WELFARE MEASURES
- The Compensation Principle and the National Income Test
This page was built for publication: Potential welfare and the sum of individual compensating or equivalent variations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1819683)