On nice equivalence relations on ^ 2

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1879002

DOI10.1007/S00153-003-0183-1zbMATH Open1081.03053arXivmath/0009064OpenAlexW2063887231MaRDI QIDQ1879002FDOQ1879002


Authors: S. Shelah Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 22 September 2004

Published in: Archive for Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The main question here is the possible generalization of the following theorem on ``simple equivalence relation on 2^omega to higher cardinals. Theorem: (1) Assume that: (a) E is a Borel 2-place relation on 2^omega, (b) E is an equivalence relation, (c) if eta, nu in 2^omega and (exists ! n)(eta(n) not= nu(n)), then eta, nu are not E --equivalent. Then there is a perfect subset of 2^omega of pairwise non E-equivalent members. (2) Instead of ``E is Borel, ``E is analytic (or even a Borel combination of analytic relations) is enough. (3) If E is a Pi^1_2 relation which is an equivalence relation satisfying clauses (b)+(c) in V^Cohen, then the conclusion of (1) holds.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0009064




Recommendations





Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: On nice equivalence relations on \(^\lambda 2\)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1879002)