Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments

DOI10.1016/J.ECONLET.2005.03.010MaRDI QIDQ1928679zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Fredrik Carlsson, Peter Frykblom, Carl Johan Lagerkvist

Publication date 3 January 2013

Published in Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://hdl.handle.net/2077/2792

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Experimental studies (91A90) Consumer behavior, demand theory (91B42)

Recommendations

• Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum
• Buying time: Real and hypothetical offers
• Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
• Inducing incentives to understate and to overstate willingness to pay within the open-ended and the dichotomous-choice elicitation formats: An experimetnal study
• Calibration of willingness-to-accept

Cites work

• Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: Are the underlying preferences the same?
• Application to the valuation of the environment
• Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
• The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study

Cited in

(8)

• Buying time: Real and hypothetical offers
• Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
• What makes cheap talk effective? Experimental evidence
• A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation
• Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum
• A Test for Anchoring and Yea-Saying in Experimental Consumption Data
• Application to the valuation of the environment
• Animals and social welfare

This page was built for publication: Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1928679)