Making sense of Bell's theorem and quantum nonlocality
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:2014303)
Abstract: Bell's theorem has fascinated physicists and philosophers since his 1964 paper, which was written in response to the 1935 paper of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen. Bell's theorem and its many extensions have led to the claim that quantum mechanics and by inference nature herself are nonlocal in the sense that a measurement on a system by an observer at one location has an immediate effect on a distant "entangled" system (one with which the original system has previously interacted). Einstein was repulsed by such "spooky action at a distance" and was led to question whether quantum mechanics could provide a complete description of physical reality. In this paper I argue that quantum mechanics does not require spooky action at a distance of any kind and yet it is entirely reasonable to question the assumption that quantum mechanics can provide a complete description of physical reality. The magic of entangled quantum states has little to do with entanglement and everything to do with superposition, a property of all quantum systems and a foundational tenet of quantum mechanics.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Making sense of Bell's theorem and quantum nonlocality
- Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement
- On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics
- Remarks on Measurements in Quantum Theory
- The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Cited in
(25)- Bell's theorem, accountability and nonlocality
- Quantum mechanics is incomplete but it is consistent with locality
- ``The unavoidable interaction between the object and the measuring instruments: reality, probability, and nonlocality in quantum physics
- Quantum versus classical entanglement: eliminating the issue of quantum nonlocality
- Bell's theorem and the different concepts of locality
- Stop making sense of Bell's theorem and nonlocality?
- Some Personal Reflections on Quantum Nonlocality and the Contributions of John Bell
- Hidden variable theories and quantum nonlocality
- Entanglement of observables: quantum conditional probability approach
- Towards an objective physics of Bell nonlocality: palatial twistor theory
- Quantum postulate vs. quantum nonlocality: on the role of the Planck constant in Bell's argument
- On the relevance of Bell's probabilistic model for spin correlations
- Making sense of Bell's theorem and quantum nonlocality
- Is Bell's theorem relevant to quantum mechanics? On locality and noncommuting observables
- Some thoughts on quantum nonlocality and its apparent incompatibility with relativity
- Bell on Bell's theorem: the changing face of nonlocality
- Conditional probability framework for entanglement and its decoupling from tensor product structure
- Counterfactual reasoning, realism and quantum mechanics: much ado about nothing?
- Bell inequalities, counterfactual definiteness and falsifiability
- Quantum mysteries revisited again
- Bell's theorem and quantum realism. Reassessment in light of the Schrödinger paradox.
- Can there be given any meaning to contextuality without incompatibility?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6675291 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the meaning of local realism
- A note on Bell's theorem logical consistency
This page was built for publication: Making sense of Bell's theorem and quantum nonlocality
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2014303)
