Solving the tower of babel problem for patient-reported outcome measures. Comments on: ``Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods

DOI10.1007/S11336-021-09778-XMaRDI QIDQ2066622zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Jakob Bue Bjorner

Publication date 14 January 2022

Published in Psychometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09778-x

zbMATH Keywords

depressionequatingitem response theorylinkingpatient-reported outcomes

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Recommendations

• Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods
• Linking and aligning scores and scales.
• Differential item functioning analyses of the Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS{\circledR}) measures: methods, challenges, advances, and future directions
• Linking item response model parameters
• Commentary: Matching IRT models to PRO constructs -- modeling alternatives, and some thoughts on what makes a model different

Cites work

• Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods
• Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples
• Test equating, scaling, and linking. Methods and practices

Cited in

(1)

• Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods

This page was built for publication: Solving the tower of babel problem for patient-reported outcome measures. Comments on: ``Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2066622)