Can pragmatist quantum realism explain protective measurements?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2103378
Recommendations
- Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state
- Interpreting quantum mechanics according to a pragmatist approach
- Agents in Healey's pragmatist quantum theory: a comparison with Pitowsky's approach to quantum mechanics
- On Uffink's criticism of protective measurements
- Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach
Cites work
- A No-Go result for QBism
- Compendium of Quantum Physics
- Quantum states as objective informational bridges
- Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach
- Scientific realism and the quantum
- Securing the objectivity of relative facts in the quantum world
- Subjectivists about quantum probabilities should be realists about quantum states
- The meaning of the wave function. In search of the ontology of quantum mechanics
- The quantum revolution in philosophy
Cited in
(5)- Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state
- Dissolving the measurement problem is not an option for the realist
- Agents in Healey's pragmatist quantum theory: a comparison with Pitowsky's approach to quantum mechanics
- WHY PROTECTIVE MEASUREMENT IMPLIES THE REALITY OF THE WAVE FUNCTION: FURTHER CONSOLIDATION
- Interpreting quantum mechanics according to a pragmatist approach
This page was built for publication: Can pragmatist quantum realism explain protective measurements?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2103378)