On Urysohn's lemma for generalized topological spaces in ZF

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2120286



Abstract: A strong generalized topological space is an ordered pair mathbfX=langleX,mathcalTangle such that X is a set and mathcalT is a collection of subsets of X such that emptyset,XinmathcalT and mathcalT is stable under arbitrary unions. A necessary and sufficient condition for a strong generalized topological space mathbfX to satisfy Urysohn's lemma or its appropriate variant is shown in mathbfZF. Notions of a U-normal and an effectively normal generalized topological space are introduced. It is observed that, in mathbfZF+mathbfDC, every U-normal generalized topological space satisfies Urysohn's lemma. It is shown that every effectively normal generalized topological space satisfies Csasz'ar's modification of Urysohn's Lemma. A mathbfZF- example of a strong generalized topological normal space which satisfies the Tietze-Urysohn Extension Theorem and fails to satisfy Urysohn's Lemma is shown.


A generalized topology [\textit{Á. Császár}, Acta Math. Hung. 96, No. 4, 351--357 (2002; Zbl 1006.54003)] on a set is a family of subsets of the set that is closed under arbitrary unions. One can copy the definition of normality to generalized topological spaces and characterize normality using Urysohn's Lemma [\textit{Á. Császár}, ibid. 115, No. 4, 309--313 (2007; Zbl 1135.54301)]. The present paper investigates how much choice is needed to prove Urysohn's lemma (and the Tietze extension theorem) in this general setting. To this end the authors consider two spaces as possible codomains: \(\mathbb{R}\), the real line with its normal topology~\(\tau_n\), and~\(\mathbf{R}\), the real line with the generalized topology~\(g\tau_n\), defined as of the closure under all unions of the family of all intervals of the form \((-\infty,a)\) and \((a,\infty)\). One can formulate Urysohn's lemma and Tietze's theorem with both these spaces as codomains; it turns out that \(\mathbf{R}\) satisfies three of the four statements, it does not satisfy Urysohn's lemma with codomain~\(\mathbb{R}\).\par Inspection of the standard proof of Urysohn's lemma will show that it holds under the assumption of~\(\mathsf{DC}\), the Principle of Dependent Choices. The authors show that the same holds for generalized topologies, with codomain~\(\mathbf{R}\), and under some extra assumptions on the space with codomain~\(\mathbb{R}\).











This page was built for publication: On Urysohn's lemma for generalized topological spaces in \(\mathbf{ZF}\)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2120286)