Parity biases in partitions and restricted partitions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2136205

DOI10.1016/J.EJC.2022.103522zbMATH Open1497.11252arXiv2111.10590OpenAlexW3215885731MaRDI QIDQ2136205FDOQ2136205


Authors: Koustav Banerjee, Sreerupa Bhattacharjee, Pankaj Jyoti Mahanta, Manjil Pratim Saikia, Manosij Ghosh Dastidar Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 10 May 2022

Published in: European Journal of Combinatorics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Let po(n) (resp. pe(n)) denote the number of partitions of n with more odd parts (resp. even parts) than even parts (resp. odd parts). Recently, Kim, Kim, and Lovejoy proved that po(n)>pe(n) for all n>2 and conjectured that do(n)>de(n) for all n>19 where do(n) (resp. de(n)) denote the number of partitions into distinct parts having more odd parts (resp. even parts) than even parts (resp. odd parts). In this paper we provide combinatorial proofs for both the result and the conjecture of Kim, Kim and Lovejoy. In addition, we show that if we restrict the smallest part of the partition to be 2, then the parity bias is reversed. That is, if qo(n) (resp. qe(n)) denote the number of partitions of n with more odd parts (resp. even parts) than even parts (resp. odd parts) where the smallest part is at least 2, then we have qo(n)<qe(n) for all n>7. We also look at some more parity biases in partitions with restricted parts.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.10590




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: Parity biases in partitions and restricted partitions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2136205)